Design A New Project
Third-Party Cost Review - Risk Free!

View All Customer Stories

Cost Oversights add $1.3MM+ to 156k GSF Market Rate Multifamily Residential Development

Review Your Existing Designs
Design A New Project

This image may not display the actual project to keep the development anonymous.

EST. $51,000,000

Initial Budget

$1,375,000

Total Saved

>2% Hard Costs

Total Cost Reduction

MARKET SECTOR

Multifamily

STRUCTURE

Podium

Don't wait for the next project. Build your competitive edge today.

View the H+O Cost Index
Start Chat

Structure costs are not something structural engineers measure, making it impossible for them to understand the cost implications of the design decisions they make day in and day out. The reality is small, seemingly insignificant design decisions greatly impact the bottom line. With the H+O Cost Index, you no longer need to accept this blind risk. We leverage technology and cost data to inform structural design so you don’t overspend.

Commercial real estate design and construction are of the most mature industries in the world. Why is that important?

It means these services are easily commoditized where clients perceive two competitors to be more or less the SAME. When a customer can’t quantify the difference in value between two companies, they defer to LOW PRICE.

They believe the outcome of working with either company will be the same.

A close contractor partner asked H+O for a second look at a 156k GSF, 5-on-1 podium project they were engaged in. To them, the design seemed extremely expensive….and they were right.

Here’s what we found:

  • Reduce composite steel podium tonnage = +/- $510,000
  • Remove unnecessary slab edge detailing = +/- $115,000
  • Reduce footings, piers and lowest level slab thickness = +/-$90,000
  • Reduce wood studs, shear walls, hold downs and omit double sheathed shear walls = +/- $380,000
    • Improve acoustic performance, MEP installation, trade clashes, etc.
  • Reduce wood truss spans = $280,000

Total potential structure savings exceeded $1,375,000, which would reduce hard costs by more than 2%. Not quantified are the additional savings from MEP install premiums, critical path schedule acceleration and reduced change order risk.

See what customers are saying...

We’re proud to support nationally recognized developers and architects.

“H+O’s proactive communication and strong processes make sure key decisions are made on time, avoiding unnecessary setbacks and keeping projects on track.

We have confidence in H+O to not only deliver, but to think big picture, supporting long-term success beyond just one project.”

Keith Boyle
CUBE 3

“Just got a view of {the H+O Cost Index} first hand on a current project. Great tool!

Found some major savings with minimal impact to the overall design.”

Jonathan Quinn
RODE Architects

“I’m diving into his detailing to try to optimize and de-risk the plans + specs, but HE ALREADY DID IT!

2 thumbs up from me.”

Matt Calkins
TOCCI

“Their ability to quickly and creatively respond to inherent challenges we encounter in the field is so important to keeping my jobs on track and moving forward.  Their collaborative approach to design, with a focus on cost efficiency and buildability, is second to none.

I wouldn’t do a job without H+O on my team.”

Marc Savatsky
Choose Boston

“I have been fortunate to work with H+O on several wood-framed projects. I have found them to have a good understanding of how to effectively utilize offsite components in a way that brings great value to their clients.

They do a great job designing cost-effective projects that are easily constructed. I would give them a high recommendation.”

Tom Dixon
MiTek

“I can confidently say they’ve been an invaluable partner. They aren’t afraid to think outside the box, which has helped us optimize our structural designs and achieve greater efficiency on each project.

I highly recommend H+O to anyone looking for a reliable, innovative and collaborative partner.”

Rob Simmons
Cathartes